Eu4 ideal army composition.

For SP, all the best horde players use infantry only (well, and artillery if available). Horse memes can be fun but that should tell you all you need to know. 1. bronzedisease. • 8 mo. ago. 50/50 is fine. But you might get to a point where Cavs cost less. In that case get more Cavs obviously. Full Cavs is fine too.TL;DR: Some army composition rules are the same no matter who you're playing, so to start with those: Always build your army frontline (infantry + cavalry) to fill the combat width + 2 or 4 more regiments (e.g., with a combat width of 20, target a mix of 22 or 24 inf + cav regiments). In the lands that hordes typically fight in this will ...At 40 combat width, undisputed optimal army composition is 32-8-40. This is making some assumptions about having a reinforcement stack nearby if you happen to engage an equal size stack. Less than 40 combat width, which means lower miltech and therefore lower supply limits is more disputed.Hi y'all, so I'm adenine chunk new to EU4, only have about a hundred hours, and the thing that confuses me the maximum is us composed. How large infantry do I...For example, at tech 32, an ideal army composition before considering monetary costs or supply limits would be: 42-46 infantry, 10 cav (optional), and 40 artillery. Artillery shouldn’t be taking casualties so you don’t need extra regiments. Them’s the basics. Everything is situational when it comes to EU4.

Google "eu4 ideal army composition excel sheet" to get the idea of how many artillery you need for each tech. You gonna need to separate them during peace and attack them together since attrition will be terrible if you use it all at once all the time. What i do if i feel lazy is this: At the beginning 16-4-0.

Combat width is the maximum amount of units that can participate in one combat "row" at one time. So in your example of 24 combat width you can have 24 units in the front line and 24 units in the back line. The game will automatically fill your frontline with infantry and cavalry and your backline with artillery.

Other Hordes or countries with huge cav bonuses. While it is absolutely crucial that you don't go over your cav ratio in battle, you should still use cavalry in your armies to a bigger extent than regular countries, especially as a horde. Tengris with 100% cav ratio should use a healthy mix of INF and CAV, 50/50 is fine.Toward the end of my back to the Piast run, I had to grab a polish enclave in the middle of Russian territory. Russia's running around with like, three times my force limit, so i was a bit worried about going to war with them.This is my usual lategame army composition, is it any good? I split my armies into 88K stacks (40/8/40), and keep them split in half when on the move or defending a pre-set defensive line. ... Stellaris, Europa Universalis, Imperator: Rome, Crusader Kings, Hearts of Iron, Victoria and Cities: Skylines. Members Online. Arumba explains why EU4 ...In my opinion the best composition is army width - 2 * Inf, 2 Cav, and army width/amount required for max bonus on forts Art. Always have at least 1 Art, because it greatly increases your chances of breaching the walls during sieges.A combat width's worth of artillery, and then the same of infantry with 4-6 cavalry for flanking as well. This is the ideal composition, but in many situations you won't be able to either field this many troops (due to the expensiveness of artillery and its relative weakness earlier in the game) or have a province with a high enough supply limit to park them.

Hey everyone! I'm by no means good at this game and I don't really understand combat, so I've been mostly using an army comp that I read online some time ago, which consisted of 8 infantry, 2 cavalry, 10 artillery, and then later when supply limit allowed it I kept the ratio and increased it (so 16/4/20 or 32/8/40 in late game).

351 votes, 34 comments. 323K subscribers in the eu4 community. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game…

There is no general best army composition, because it depends on many factors. Often cavalry is a better than infantry, but it is much more expensive so it is usually not worth the cost. Likewise artillery helps, because it can shoot from the backrow, but it is even more expansive than cavalry, so it is not worth it for its fighting power in ...Quick and dirty army composition: I/C/A = width/4/width (incl which unit type to pick) Tip. TLDR: for the easiest good template: use infantry and cannons equal to your combat width, and add 4 horses. Before tech 16, pick inf and cav with the best offensive shock pips, and arty doesn't matter. After tech 16, pick inf with the best defensive fire ...The help thread has a list of resources, including one on army composition based on tech level. Reply. JackNotOLantern. •. Levels 1-15: 4 cav and rest of combat width infantry. At Level 7 add 1-10 cannons for siege. Level 16+: add full combat width of cannons. You may do a siege stack 10/0/10 for fast sieges before Level 16.Overall, as long as the first army isn't crushed, you should be fine. And now that I've thought about it, going 12/8/10 or 10/10/10 should be fine for the PLC, simply because they can do so without incurring the insufficient support modifier as easily as a western nation might. With the PLC, (especially a Polish-led PLC) cavalry can reach up to ...This is my usual lategame army composition, is it any good? I split my armies into 88K stacks (40/8/40), and keep them split in half when on the move or defending a pre-set defensive line. ... Stellaris, Europa Universalis, Imperator: Rome, Crusader Kings, Hearts of Iron, Victoria and Cities: Skylines. Members Online. Arumba explains why EU4 ...MrCard-Gaming. •. Depends on what you want to do. You are in a decent position for almost anything: Protestant HRE, HRE dismantle, Semi tall with Lubeck, Very wide with religious into Russia, Colonial, wtv anything can work with Sweden since you have good ideas and events, good position and lack of missions to steer you one way. For military ...

Both horses and cannons cost a lot. While it's nice to have 50% cannons, cost is extreme and early on it's rather pointless. Filling first row with infantry and few horses, while positioning artillery at the back will put you over supply limits in most provinces, plus a seasoned general will add more benefits to mostly infantry armies than … Sure, in terms of pure damage to the enemy, a big army with full row will have optimized damage, however, you must also take morale damage into consideration, so that's why having a bit of reserved troops can help a lot in equal-strength fights. 2. KuntaStillSingle. Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... Which means that the best army composition is achieved through sheer amount of money because it's so expensive to have 20+ artillery in the early to mid game. Regarding your question, half cav seems a bit much if you are playing a western nation after the first 80 or so years. It's probably good if you are Poland ...the army composition depends on your tech level. early on you should go for ~60-70% inf + rest cavalry, as soon as you get cannons add ONE or TWO to the stack. start going towards your compositon after MIL 13 or so. (slowly, no need to reach that army composition before MIL 16 at least)So, without army composition, the AI can't make shit armies, and the newer players can't make terrible armies, loose, and stop the game or just follow mechanically a guide that is bad but failproof. I'm also guilty of playing 2 cav-rest inf-canons up to battle width like the vast majority of players, and I don't switch to 50%cav on cav techs ...At 40 combat width, undisputed optimal army composition is 32-8-40. This is making some assumptions about having a reinforcement stack nearby if you happen to engage an equal size stack. Less than 40 combat width, which means lower miltech and therefore lower supply limits is more disputed.

Ideal army composition for every tech Mil tech Combat width Infantry Cavalry Cannons Total Comments 0 15 17 4 0 21 For the reasoning behind this, see Zwirbaum's great unit guide. 2 20 22 4 0 26 Or this video by darkfireslide 5 22 24 4 0 28 If you find yourself to be a horde you may want to ignore all this and go full cavalry; I'm not sure if ...There is no 'ideal' composition. There are good ones. Start with a general, always make sure you have a general. Make your army big. Bigger armies are less likely to be engaged and less likely to lose. Start with infantry. Up to full combat width or force limit, whichever comes first. When cannons come along get at least 5, 6 is better and 10 ...

Go to eu4 r/eu4. r/eu4. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. ... For once and for all! What's the ideal army composition in this situation: Advice Wanted It is 1662, combat width of 32. BATTLE! Two lines, one in front of another, divided in 32 ...Heavies take up 3 width, galleys 0.33, and light ships 1. Heavies offer the most punch per naval force limit; galleys in inland seas are most efficient per engagement width. So optimize according to your constraints and where you'd need to fight (Baltic Sea is inland, but if you venture into the North Sea it's not); most likely with heavies.If the supply limit is less than the ideal army composition, split up your armies and just recombine them when you are going to engage another army, or an army is about to engage you. You don't want to take a lot of attrition. ... ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio.Infantry+cavalry = combat width x 1.5 Artillery = combat width. Your infantry:cavalry ratio might vary by nation, but basically I use Cavalry = Mil Tech / 2. Such that at 16 tech I have 8 cavalry in an attack. And the rest infantry. The new reinforcement rules, change some support tactics, but I just break an army into 3 parts for manuevers to ...Army composition guides in eu4 are hard to come by and are varied, but this army composition guide is from a player with 6k+ hours in the game. EU4 1.30 Emperor definitely has changed a lot of things in the game and army composition is somewhat reflected in those changes, especially with the new mercenary companies playing a much bigger role in ...However, if you want to optimize for combat strength, optimal army composition is always, i.e. from the start of the game, a full back row of artillery, as much cavalry as your ratio can afford and the rest infantry, obviously modified to account for any casualties. Before tech 13/16, however, such a composition is grossly cost-ineffective.So, without army composition, the AI can't make shit armies, and the newer players can't make terrible armies, loose, and stop the game or just follow mechanically a guide that is bad but failproof. I'm also guilty of playing 2 cav-rest inf-canons up to battle width like the vast majority of players, and I don't switch to 50%cav on cav techs ...A lot of you asked me for war-related EU4 guides. I'm always happy to help you so today we are going to start with guide about Army Composition. Next one in ...

A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox Development Studio. Members Online Am I the only one annoyed by the fact that level 2 and 3 advisors could cost as much as an entire army’s maintenance

325K subscribers in the eu4 community. A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by…

Military Innovations and Army Composition. ... What are The Best Idea Groups for Poland in EU4? Choosing the right idea groups in Europa Universalis IV can significantly impact your nation’s success. For Poland, which has a unique position in Europe and specific strengths and challenges, selecting idea groups that bolster its …Ideal Army Composition and Unit Types in Eu4 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or view presentation slides online. Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site.I heard 3/1/1 but don't quote me on that. There is no penalty for having a wonky army comp rn so mostly artillery and some lancers for offensive armies. And infantry only for defensive armies, the AI doesn't really build cavalry or artillery so your infantry will be more than enough to defend.Ideal template is always Inf/Cav to fill your front line and have Art on your back row. In early game Art doesn't do too much damage from back row but mid-late game it just decimates enemy armies. But if you can't fill your front row with inf or cav, art eill be on front row and they take extra damage on front row.Hello everyone, as you may know, there is this wonderful Ideal army composition for every tech spreadsheet, which has been last updated to 1.33 by u/twistysquare. Since then, there have been some changes to combat and units in 1.34, as outlined in this Dev Diary. Aside from fixing zombie regiments, the most important changes (in regards to this ...3. Sort by: cousin_pat115. • 1 yr. ago. Combat width at tech 26 is 40, so you would need 40 units in the front row (infanty, cavalry) and preferably 40 units in the back row (artillery.) If your supply limit in a certain province isn't high enough to support an 80 stack, just split them into 2 40 stacks until you have to siege a fort/fight ...Europa Universalis IV. Army composition with Nomads. Thread starter kmh42; Start date Dec 23, 2015; ... I am fairly new to EUIV and have a hard time with army composition. ... Ideal composition in early game would be full cav for hordes, but thats too expensive so you should have a mix of two that doesn't favor infantry and doesn't hurt your ...For a better explanation of composition, and even for combat mechanics in general, check out Reman's Paradox War Acadamy on Youtube. Part 1 is the composition IIRC, and part 2 is Mechanics. Part 3 covers idea groups, but it's not as important.100% cavalry, only engage on flat terrain. I'm not a Tengri horde. Have around 65% cavalry if 75% is your limit, because if you lose some infantry in battle and therefore get over 75% cav ratio you'll get a malus on them. As said only fight on flat terrain like grassland, steppes, dessert etc for the shock bonus.

Your army is therefore significantly better than the enemy army, which is why you win so handily.) You said that 90% of the casualties are caused by artillery, which means that if two otherwise-identical armies meet then 90% of the damage is inflicted by the artillery in each army. This is substantially different to the artillery vs no ...A combat width's worth of artillery, and then the same of infantry with 4-6 cavalry for flanking as well. This is the ideal composition, but in many situations you won't be able to either field this many troops (due to the expensiveness of artillery and its relative weakness earlier in the game) or have a province with a high enough supply limit to park them. You can see cavalry tests on my profile. Basically it depends on the tech level and it's a zig zag pattern. At tech 3, the ideal army does 20% more casualties. Just the first time infantry gets a buff/new unit, this advantage drops to near 0. This goes on until the next cavalry bonus, and so on. Guys please advise me army composition for Russia(18th miltech+defensive ideas) This thread is archived New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A StockBoy829 Grand Duke • ... r/eu4 • I recommend for more players to play outside of Europe its one of the biggest traps in the game ...Instagram:https://instagram. locust nail saloncleveland tn food stamp office17xx mosbrogan doodlebug car Make sure to fight on flat ground. Lacking arty was more impactful than fighting on rough terrain though. It really is that important to have arty. Anyone saying that you should run 100% CAV is implying that your frontline should consist only of CAV, backline still requires arty. Little_Elia. flagship theater pottstown pennsylvaniahow to reset password on xfinity modem Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by mirukuru. Hordes and army composition . One of the big advantages of being a horde is completely ignoring the insufficient support penalty and having superior cavalry to other nations from the start of the game. However, I'm curious as to how effective a 90-100% cavalry army really is, vs a more economically balanced one ...4 cav per army, and as much infantry as the current combat width allows, halved. If combat width is 30, you want to have 4 cav and 11 inf per stack. 30/2=15. Once you unlock artillery (Tech 7), have 2 art per stack. Once you get to tech 16 artillery becomes the dominant damage dealer in combat, so you want half of the combat width to be artillery. zales bill payment Ignoring very special edge cases (like nations with massive Cav modifiers) the best army composition is combat width Infantry (for front row) + combat width Cannons …2)+0.2 military tactics is huge, it provides a flat modifier to damage taken so you are taking 13.3% more losses from military tactics alone. 3) You have a -1 to all rolls from a terrain penalty. 4) Your leader is 2/1/2/0, Spains is 6/4/1/1 so they are a net 4/3/-1/1 better.